Processing math: 100%

NOTES ON STATISTICS, PROBABILITY and MATHEMATICS


Minimal notes on Galois theory:


Extension Fields:


Adjoining one or all the roots of a polynomial creating a new field is a FOIL operation:

For instance, extending the field of rational numbers Q with 2 to obtain a new field implies adding all the values of the form a+b2. Now, if we add to this new field Q(2) the 3, the new extended field will have to contain α+β3 with both αQ(2) and βQ(2). Therefore,

α+β3=(a+b2)+(c+d2)3=a+b2+c3+d6

Considering this field extension Q(2,3) as a vector field a set of basis can be {1,2,3,6}. Therefore the extension has degree 4.

Another way of getting the degree of the extension is the polynomial of the degree of the polynomial whose root is adjoined. This is multiplicative, so the polynomials in the case above are x22 and x23, both of degree 2, yielding the extension by the roots of both of them of degree 4. The mathematical notation for the degree of the extension Q(2) over Q, is [Q(2):Q]=2.

Given an algebraic root rF, the minimal polynomial of r over F is the irreducible polynomial in F[x] of which r is a root. This is unique up to scalar multiplication. The degree of the extension Q(r) is the degree of the minimal polynomial of r.

The equivalent term for degree on the corresponding group lattice is term index: the index of a subgroup H in a group G is the number of left cosets of $H $ in G, or equivalently, the number of right cosets of H in G. The index is denoted [G:H].


Galois extension:

We say that an algebraic extension of a larger field L over a base field K, i.e. L/K, is Galois if L is a splitting field of a separable polynomial with coefficients in K.

A normal extension is an algebraic field extension L/K for which every irreducible polynomial over K which has a root in L, splits into linear factors in L. These are one of the conditions for algebraic extensions to be a Galois extension.

A splitting field of a polynomial with coefficients in a field is the smallest field extension of that field over which the polynomial splits, i.e., decomposes into linear factors.

In other words, to create a Galois extension all the roots of a polynomial should be included.


Automorphisms:

An automorphism is a bijection within the field that preserves the structure:

ϕ(a+b)=ϕ(a)+ϕ(b)

and

ϕ(ab)=ϕ(a)ϕ(b) Example:

Proving that in the field Q(2) the function

Q(2)Q(2)ϕ:a+b2ab2

is an automorphism requires proving:

ϕ((a+b2)+(c+d2))?=ϕ((a+b2))+ϕ(c+d2))

ϕ((a+b2)(c+d2))?=ϕ((a+b2))ϕ(c+d2))

and that it is a bijection.


The set of all automorphisms under composition is the Galois group. From Wikipedia:

Suppose that E is an extension of the field F (written as E/F and read “E over F”). An automorphism of E/F is defined to be an automorphism of $ E$ that fixes F pointwise. In other words, an automorphism of $ E/F$ is an isomorphism α:EE such that α(x)=x for each xF. The set of all automorphisms of E/F forms a group with the operation of function composition. This group is sometimes denoted by Aut(E/F). If E/F is a Galois extension, then it is called the Galois group of E/F, and is usually denoted by Gal(E/F).


Fundamental theorem of Galois theory:

From Wikipedia:

Given a field extension L/K that is finite and Galois, there is a one-to-one correspondence between its intermediate fields L0Lk and subgroups of its Galois group 1=𝐺0<G1<<Gk=G.

For any subgroup H of Gal(L/K), the corresponding fixed field, denoted LH, is the set of those elements of L which are fixed by every automorphism in H.

For any intermediate field M of L/K, the corresponding subgroup is Aut(L/M), that is, the set of those automorphisms in Gal(L/K) which fix every element of M.

The fundamental theorem says that this correspondence is a one-to-one correspondence if (and only if) L/K is a Galois extension. For example, the topmost field L corresponds to the trivial subgroup of Gal(L/K), and the base field K corresponds to the whole group Gal(L/K).


The quintic problem:

From Wikipedia:

A group G is called solvable if it has a subnormal series whose factor groups (quotient groups) are all abelian, that is, if there are subgroups 1=G0<G1<<Gk=G such that Gj1 is normal in Gj, and Gj/Gj1 is an abelian group, for j=1,2,,k.


On the image above, there are two left cosets of the normal subgroup generated by <r>, i.e. H={e,r,r2}C3 of the dihedral group G=D3S3, namely the subgroup itself, and fH={f,fr,fr2}. Therefore, the quotient group G/H (G mod H) is G/H=D3/HC2Z2 or cyclic group of order 2.


The subgroups have to be normal to form quotient groups, i.e. set of cosets of a normal subgroup of a group.

Why does it have to be abelian? This is the key to understand Galois insolvability of the quintic. The relationship between abelian and solvable by radicals is explained, for instance, in here. In this post it seems to imply that we can think of abelian as cyclic in the context of finite groups:

A group G is called solvable if it has a subnormal series whose factor groups (quotient groups) are all abelian, that is, if there are subgroups 1=𝐺0<G1<<Gk=G such that 𝐺𝑗1 is normal in 𝐺𝑗, and 𝐺𝑗/𝐺𝑗1 is a cyclic group, for j=1,,k.

These cyclic quotient groups can be produced by cyclotomic (roots of unity) or Kummer (all the roots of the polynomial added with the caveat that the roots of unity are already in the field extension immediately below).

There is a Galois correspondence between the subgroup lattice of the D3 group above and the field extension lattice Q(ζ,32 of the polynomial X32:

Image credit to Visual Group Theory Lectures by Professor Macauley


Home Page

NOTE: These are tentative notes on different topics for personal use - expect mistakes and misunderstandings.